Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Finn Tropy's avatar

Your conclusion is right — Notes are discovery, articles are positioning.

But I've been digging into a layer underneath that.

The subscribers Notes bring you aren't random. They come from specific clusters — creators who restack you, publications that recommend you, readers who already follow someone in your graph. 40% of my 1,466 subscribers arrived through 49 peer recommendations. The top 12 sources sent 81% of that.

Notes accelerate movement through a graph that already exists. Which means the format matters less than knowing which rooms your readers are already in — and whether you're showing up there before you hit publish.

I wrote about this today if you're curious:

https://finntropy.substack.com/p/your-subscribers-already-belong-to

Chinedu Okelikwu's avatar

I found it the same way for me too. Most of my subscribers come from notes, and that makes sense as Notes is the social engine of Substack.

By the way, where did you see that settings for Notes that brought in subscribers? I'm curious to check mine too.

8 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?